At the mayor's office, Hauchecorne learns that he has been accused of picking up the pocketbook. He returns back to town to celebrate and divulge his innocence only to find that still no one believes his guilt has been absolved. Monsieur Loisel bent over backwards to help find the diamond necklace her wife lost and even helped to pay for the replacement. Every one told of his affairs, of his purchases and his sales. Analysis of Literary Devices 1.
He, himself should be blamed since he let the people around him affect him. It is the best of both worlds. Even after years of travel, lovers and a meaningful childhood. In the market-place at Goderville was a great crowd, a mingled multitude of men and beasts. Hauchecorne ends up becoming physically ill and dying because he's so upset at this accusation. Another character is Maître Malandain. In a third-person view story, the reader can see the story itself from different points of view, and not just one.
It has long roads and a public square. They heard once more at a distance the dull beating of the drum and the faint voice of the crier. It allows for more variation. However, both stories are set in the past. Suddenly the drum began to beat in the courtyard before the house. Judging them immediately the way they act. Upon travelling to the market one morning, Hauchecorne happens upon a piece of string in the road and picks it up.
He can also be a dynamic character. Why had they called him 'great rogue'? Three spits were turning, loaded with chickens, with pigeons and with joints of mutton, and a delectable odor of roast meat and of gravy flowing over crisp brown skin arose from the hearth, kindled merriment, caused mouths to water. After being accused a theft no one ever looked at him the same even after the wallet was returned by another man. The supernatural in Maupassant, however, is often implicitly a symptom of the protagonists' troubled minds; Maupassant was fascinated by the burgeoning discipline of psychiatry, and attended the public lectures of Jean-Martin Charcot between 1885 and 1886. Nobody believes him, especially when he tells everyone that he'd picked up a piece of string.
The Piece of String lays out the plotline more strictly, not leaving as much room for reader interpretation. In my opinion, Hauchecome is more of an ignorant man. At Jourdain's the great room was filled with eaters, just as the vast court was filled with vehicles of every sort -- wagons, gigs, chars-a- bancs, tilburies, innumerable vehicles which have no name, yellow with mud, misshapen, pieced together, raising their shafts to heaven like two arms, or it may be with their nose on the ground and their rear in the air. For the rest of the night, the. The mayor believes Malandain because he 'is a man whose word can be relied on' and would not mistake a string for a wallet. There was something that was keeping him awake, and he paced his room back and forth. He tries relentlessly, but unsuccessfully, to persuade them that he was merely picking up a piece of string.
Minor Characters were also seen in the story. The more he denied it, the more artful his arguments, the less he was believed. As well as being frugal, Maitre Hauchecome was also innocent. Quickly, Maitre Malandain accused Maitre Hauchecome of stealing the wallet, and the town believed that Maitre Hauchecome was rich, but Maitre Hauchecome was not. I took up my hat to make my escape, and just as I reached the door, I passed the large glass in the hall, which she had put there so that she might look at herself every day from head to foot as she went out, from her little boots to her bonnet.
He brooded over it all night long. There is nothing so shameful as to be placed under a cloud on account of a lie. Sure, the serious themes are there: the poor have no power; the poor have no voice; the system is stacked against them. The mayor was waiting for him, seated in an armchair. People easily believe in rumors and give accusations immediately without asking for the real story.
Maitre Hauchecorne remained speechless and grew more and more uneasy. In both of the stories the main character is driven into an unstable state by old memories and past occurrences. Every one, except some of the most indifferent, was on their feet at once and ran to the door, to the windows, their mouths full and napkins in their hand. Maitre Hauchecorne, of Breaute, had just arrived at Goderville and was making his way toward the square when he perceived on the ground a little piece of string. He could not finish his dinner, and went away amid a chorus of jeers. Malandain, standing on his doorstep, began to laugh as he saw him pass.
In the first few lines of the story, the narrator introduces… 1463 Words 6 Pages Guy de Maupassant, a French writer, was born in August 1850 and died in July 1893, during which the Franco-Prussian war took place. Also, because of coming from a poor family, she always dreamed to have beautiful and expensive dresses, jewels, and a house which is aristocratically equipped. In the case of Maître Hauchecome, he was wrongly alleged by his enemy of getting the pocketbook. It is seen throughout the story that the main character… 1681 Words 7 Pages Whoever said greed is the root of all evil was right. Some criminals are away from penalties, while the innocent people are being punished and are becoming the victims.
A protege of Flaubert, Maupassant's short stories are characterized by their economy of style and their efficient effortless dénouement. He seemed to feel their remarks behind his back. Point of View The story is uttered in Third Person Point of View since the narrator of the story is not a character in the story. This tale is poignant and quite sad. That person happened to be Maitre Maladain, the evil man turning Hauchecome in for a crime he had not committed. He knows that a neighbor is watching him, so he searches for an object that doesn't exist.