To promote the love for reading, teachers should emphasise the aesthetic stance. What is the Reader Response Theory? Montelongo: The goal is to present a coherent essay with a clear argument. The second paragraph would explain why l liked learning about 19th century England. Whereas many discuss literary works objectively, absolutely and with respect to how the author developed the ideas on the page, reader response criticism focuses on the reader and how she or he receives the literary work. Please just staple your papers in the upper left hand corner. To analyze it, you need to connect and converse with the text. The theory of Reader Response questions the existence, indulgence, and participation of the reader in joining the writer and helping him creating the text meaning.
Johnson gives statistics showing that talking on a cell phone is as dangerous as driving drunk. The Annenberg Learner website adds that this theory contributes to a dynamic way of teaching that encourages students to explore and synthesize texts, helping them to develop creativity and comprehension skills that go beyond trying to simply find the correct answer. A Reading Response you must read a book and then write about thebook you just read you can include important events and things A response is when someone is talking and you or the otherperson talk back and respond to what the other person hadsaid. A holistic view The main argument of reader-response theory is that readers, as much as the text, play an active role in a reading experience Rosenblatt, 1994. It is through this interaction that meaning is made. If the group finds certain elements to be more significant than others, it might examine the text from this particular viewpoint, or lens.
Darwin's theory of evolution was just that, a theory. As there are as many interpretations of a text as there are readers, teachers should be more receptive to different responses from their students. This form of criticism even goes so far as to examine the role that individual words and phrases in the text play when interacting with the reader. Did the text communicate with you? There are many ways to write a good essay, but I will give you a general guide to follow which will help you to organize your ideas. Of course, the burden is on us to support our claim that a given textual meaning is determinate or indeterminate. For example, we have Plate and Aristotle who were concerned about audience responses and how plays generated pity and fear on them.
You can also use appropriate background information from the textbook and lectures, but you should use most of your space to discuss the documents. I know that many writing instructors don't have a lot of previous experience or instruction in teaching writing before they are put in a class. Ask someone else to read your draft s and write their comments and suggestions on how you might improve the work directly on your drafts. Determinate meaning refers to what might be called the facts of the text, certain events in the plot or physical descriptions clearly provided by the words on the page. Do not use words or ideas from the internet, from any publication, or from the work of another student without citing the source. Try to address the text as an educated adult, who knows how to analyze important aspects of writing. The theory takes into account the characte … ristics of the location site: land price, labor costs, transportation costs and access, environmental restrictions, worker unions, population, etc.
There is absolutely no need to refer to other, outside sources for this assignment—this is a critical essay, not a research paper. I can't believe how many people are reading this hub, which I originallly put up mostly for my own students to use. In addition, transactional analysis accounts for the range of successful readings produced even by the New Critics themselves, despite their belief that every text authorizes a single best reading. Does reader response theory suggest that any interpretation is valid? Try to establish a connection. It was quite fun in those days because the professor obviously chose books that where especially thought provoking and that made it much more interesting and easy too.
The reader is seen as a psychological subject who can be studied based on his or her unconscious drives brought to the surface by his or her reaction to a text. The way this works is that you tell half of a story or conversation in the introduction and then tell the rest of the story in the conclusion. It is one of the best ways you can analyze the ideas of the text and evaluate how the text has convinced its readers or whether it is effective or not. After the appearance of reader response theory, readers are activated. According to it, literature is like a performing art that enables reader creates his own text-related unique performance. For example, a child who grows up in a health-conscious environment may regard ice cream as unhealthy food whereas a child from a different background may view it as a treat.
Reader-response theorists recognize that texts do not interpret themselves. This idea developed into what came to be known as Transactional Reader Response Criticism. When quoting or citing from the documents or your textbook, simply put author and page numbers in parenthesis. Try these variations: Jones argues Jones explains Jones warns Jones suggests Jones advises Jones contends Jones investigates Jones asks Contrary to what you may have learned in previous writing classes, you should not repeat or summarize your arguments in the conclusion. Here is an example: I really enjoyed Anthony Trollope's novel Can You Forgive Her? For ins … tance, fear of the consequences of not purchasing a product may be induced in order to simulate the purchase response.
Louise Rosenblatt should be credited as the initiator of reader response theory. Often actions used to stimulate the required behaviour are emotional in content. It does not ground itself on just creating objective meanings. Finally, I Googled this topic and realized that there isn't much on the web explaining how to write reading responses, even though that is a very common essay topic in a lot of disciplines. It is a semi-imaginary amalgamation of all her adaptations, half cloaked in myths and rumors. Readers have been responding to what they have read and experienced since the dawn of literature. Each of these theories has come from a different school of thoughts, forming a strict sense of the systematic study of literature.
Foundational Beliefs In reader response criticism, the act of reading is like a dialogue between the reader and the text that has meaning only when the two are joined in conversation. When we read in the efferent mode, we focus just on the information contained in the text, as if it were a storehouse of facts and ideas that we could carry away with us. Use quotes and examples to discuss how the text disagrees with what you think about the world and about right and wrong. The reader ultimately creates meaning based not only on what is in the text, but what the text has provoked inside him or her. I'm glad you've asked whether a reading response paper can be about a piece of literature. Carroll's wit, his intellect, his artistry, his sense of play, is lost on them, and they cannot accept a text so open and so ambivalent.
Reader response criticism not only allows for, but even interests itself in how these meanings to change from reader to reader and from time to time. It is actually how would the readers response to the message of the writer. Example from Heart of Darkness, again taking our critical topic as our theoretical example, is rather obviously trying to do something to its reader, to change him or his mind in some way. Her conclusion is that we need to personally decide not to use a cell phone while driving and that we need to educate our friends and family to give up cell phones while driving, too. It is a theme of a mysterious unity of a universe.